<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Controlling Distribution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesophist.wordpress.com/2007/11/19/controlling-distribution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesophist.wordpress.com/2007/11/19/controlling-distribution/</link>
	<description>Arguments for Enlightenment's Sake</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 10:44:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: epilnivek</title>
		<link>http://thesophist.wordpress.com/2007/11/19/controlling-distribution/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>epilnivek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesophist.wordpress.com/2007/11/19/controlling-distribution/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Agreed. Word-of-mouth through social networks, things like Twitter, etc. seems to be the only currently-extant system that has a shot at breaking that stranglehold.

My experiences in the Mac software world have taught me a lot about word-of-mouth: if you can get somebody &quot;cool&quot; to talk about how good your application is, people will buy it. End of story. No advertising necessary, just a blog with an RSS feed and lots of people who think you&#039;re cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Word-of-mouth through social networks, things like Twitter, etc. seems to be the only currently-extant system that has a shot at breaking that stranglehold.</p>
<p>My experiences in the Mac software world have taught me a lot about word-of-mouth: if you can get somebody &#8220;cool&#8221; to talk about how good your application is, people will buy it. End of story. No advertising necessary, just a blog with an RSS feed and lots of people who think you&#8217;re cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheSophist</title>
		<link>http://thesophist.wordpress.com/2007/11/19/controlling-distribution/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>TheSophist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 06:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesophist.wordpress.com/2007/11/19/controlling-distribution/#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Hey Kevin, thanks for visiting. :)  I enjoyed our discussion as well.

You won&#039;t find someone who hates Hollywood MORE I think than me.  Their stupidity and venality are both in plain evidence.  And the Big Media&#039;s strategy towards DRM and such (and that includes Apple and iTunes, incidentally) is abominable.

But having said all that, I just find my compadres in the so-called &quot;Web 2.0&quot; space ridiculous many times with their seeming faith that as long as some VC funds it, and the site is &quot;cool&quot; in some way, that they&#039;ll be billionaires.  I&#039;ve sat through far too many meetings where people talk on and on about &quot;changing the paradigm&quot; and &quot;inventing new business models&quot; and such without ever answering the question: Who Pays?

Having said all that, personally, I think the biggest threat to Big Media is social-networking sites and Big Blogs.  If an alternative to the marketing power of Big Media is firmly established -- and as a marketer, I know the most important marketing is word-of-mouth -- and influencers of Big Blogs (e.g., think Engadget) take off... then studio executives should start worrying in a big way.

-TS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kevin, thanks for visiting. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I enjoyed our discussion as well.</p>
<p>You won&#8217;t find someone who hates Hollywood MORE I think than me.  Their stupidity and venality are both in plain evidence.  And the Big Media&#8217;s strategy towards DRM and such (and that includes Apple and iTunes, incidentally) is abominable.</p>
<p>But having said all that, I just find my compadres in the so-called &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; space ridiculous many times with their seeming faith that as long as some VC funds it, and the site is &#8220;cool&#8221; in some way, that they&#8217;ll be billionaires.  I&#8217;ve sat through far too many meetings where people talk on and on about &#8220;changing the paradigm&#8221; and &#8220;inventing new business models&#8221; and such without ever answering the question: Who Pays?</p>
<p>Having said all that, personally, I think the biggest threat to Big Media is social-networking sites and Big Blogs.  If an alternative to the marketing power of Big Media is firmly established &#8212; and as a marketer, I know the most important marketing is word-of-mouth &#8212; and influencers of Big Blogs (e.g., think Engadget) take off&#8230; then studio executives should start worrying in a big way.</p>
<p>-TS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: epilnivek</title>
		<link>http://thesophist.wordpress.com/2007/11/19/controlling-distribution/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>epilnivek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesophist.wordpress.com/2007/11/19/controlling-distribution/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>This is Kevin Lipe, and Fork Bombr is my little slice of the blag-o-sphere.

I absolutely agree with you that the &quot;who pays&quot; question is important and is, truly, missing from Andreessen&#039;s original post.

I guess when I mentioned iTunes as being the store where I get most of my content (I don&#039;t even really like the word &quot;content&quot;, it&#039;s a little too much of a euphemism for me) but ideally there should be an ecosystem of iTunes-like stores (like the Amazon store, and other ones currently not extant) competing with one another. 

I&#039;ll be the first to admit that my ideas of a new business model for the entertainment industry are entirely half-baked, but I do think that there&#039;s got to be a better way forward for the industry than increasing DRM and restrictions on the ways people can, well, be entertained. I don&#039;t know what it will take for that shift to happen, but I don&#039;t think playing hardball with writers when shows like the Office and Grey&#039;s Anatomy are the crown jewels of the fall lineup is such a good idea for television.

Anyway, just my $0.02, again. This is definitely an interesting topic of discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is Kevin Lipe, and Fork Bombr is my little slice of the blag-o-sphere.</p>
<p>I absolutely agree with you that the &#8220;who pays&#8221; question is important and is, truly, missing from Andreessen&#8217;s original post.</p>
<p>I guess when I mentioned iTunes as being the store where I get most of my content (I don&#8217;t even really like the word &#8220;content&#8221;, it&#8217;s a little too much of a euphemism for me) but ideally there should be an ecosystem of iTunes-like stores (like the Amazon store, and other ones currently not extant) competing with one another. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be the first to admit that my ideas of a new business model for the entertainment industry are entirely half-baked, but I do think that there&#8217;s got to be a better way forward for the industry than increasing DRM and restrictions on the ways people can, well, be entertained. I don&#8217;t know what it will take for that shift to happen, but I don&#8217;t think playing hardball with writers when shows like the Office and Grey&#8217;s Anatomy are the crown jewels of the fall lineup is such a good idea for television.</p>
<p>Anyway, just my $0.02, again. This is definitely an interesting topic of discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
